a and b b and c a and d b and d Sanders (1964) that affected the impact of the Supreme Court's decision was the status of each state and how the laws applied within them.Wesberry filed a suit against the governor of Georgia claiming that the Fifth Congressional District, or which he was a part of, was 2 to 3 times larger than some of the other districts in the state and Start around 16 weeks before your AP exam (this would be around the beginning of the second semester for many students). The list of important cases is endless. Make a list of the 10 you consider most likely to happen. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) United States v. Lopez (1995) Unit 2: Interactions Among Branches of Government Baker v. Carr (1962) Shaw v. Reno (1993) Marbury v. Madison (1803) Unit 3: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Engel v. Vitale (1962) Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) Schenck v . After the 1990 census, the North Carolina General Assembly redrew its congressional districts to account for changes in population. The Georgia Supreme Court affirmed a judgment. In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two "majority-minority" districts. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the electoral districts of state legislative chambers must be roughly equal in population.Along with Baker v.Carr (1962) and Wesberry v.Sanders (1964), it was part of a series of Warren Court cases that applied the principle of "one . Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Subsequent Cases Regarding Size/Proportionality: Subsequent Cases Regarding Racial Composition: This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings, Dissent by Justices Frankfurter and Harlan, Last edited on 28 February 2023, at 16:54, Learn how and when to remove this template message, List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 369, Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama, "Whittaker is leaving U.S. Supreme Court", "Baker v. Carr, 369 US 186 - Supreme Court 1962 - Google Scholar", Landmark Cases: Historic Supreme Court Decisions, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baker_v._Carr&oldid=1142122604, The redistricting of state legislative districts is not a, Brennan, joined by Warren, Black, Douglas, Clark, Stewart. Make ALL the notes you can about it - on index cards, Quizlet, anything works! Baker v. Carr (1962) Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Supreme Court case that held that federal courts could hear cases alleging that a state's drawing of electoral boundaries, i.e. Procedural History: The cases of McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) and Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) established what legal precedent? [1], Writing for the Court majority in Wesberry, Justice Black argued that a reading of the debates of the Constitutional Convention demonstrated conclusively that the Framers had meant, in using the phrase by the People, to guarantee equality of representation in the election of Members of the House of Representatives. Wesberry v. Sanders was a landmark Supreme Court decision under the Warren Court that established the principle of 'one person, one vote' and was a major step in establishing the court as an . Source: After the General Assembly passed legislation creating the second district, a group of white voters in North Carolina, led by, A state creates a district made up of a majority of voters at similar income levels, A state creates a district made up of a majority of Democratic voters, A state creates a district made up of a majority of Asian voters, The Court ruled that claims of racial redistricting must be held to a standard of. James P. Wesberry resided in a Georgia congressional district with a population two to three times greater than that of other congressional districts in the state. Corrections? They used their experience to protect the new country to protect it from a tyrant. He asserted that because there was only one congressman for each district, his vote was debased as a result of the state apportionment statute and the state's . Make sure you review these flashcards week to week, and by AP exam time, youll be perfect! This address almost always involved a prayer - students were not required to attend, but many of those present were students. Each week, you might also want to create your OWN free response questions. Wesberry v. Sanders is a landmark case because it mandated that congressional districts throughout the country must be roughly equal in population. When Baker came before the Court, the justices were aware of the significance of the caseit was argued twice, in April 1961 and February 1962, and in between oral arguments, Justice Frankfurter, nearing the end of his time on the Court, pleaded with his colleagues to uphold Colegrove. Baker v. Carr: Summary. In his majority opinion, which was joined by five other justices, Associate Justice Hugo Black held that Article One required that "as nearly as practicable one man's vote in a congressional election is to be worth as much as another's." The Court formulated the famous "one person, one vote" standard under American jurisprudence for legislative redistricting, holding that each individual had to be weighted equally in legislative apportionment. In 1963, James P. Wesberry, In 1963, James P. Wesberry lived in a Georgia congressional district that had a population double than that of other congressional districts in the state. Answer: d. to inform readers of the reasons why the Grimms collected their tales. Baker v. Carr and subsequent cases fundamentally changed the nature of political representation in the United States, requiring not just Tennessee but nearly every state to redistrict during the 1960s, often several times. Fast Facts: Baker v. Carr Associate Justice Charles Evans Whittaker was so torn over the case that he eventually had to recuse himself for health reasons. The large majority in this case can in many ways be attributed to Justice Brennan, who convinced Potter Stewart that the case was a narrow ruling dealing only with the right to challenge the statute. The three cases Baker v. Carr, Wesberry v. Sanders, and Reynolds v. Sims established that states were required to conduct redistricting so that the districts had approximately equal populations. As a result, virtually every state legislature was reapportioned, ultimately causing the political power in most state legislatures to shift from rural to urban areas. Which of the following systems of government concentrates the most power at the national level? Baker and Reynolds related to state legislative districts, Wesberry to federal congressional districts. Basically both societies used the "Godfather" system in forms suited to their time and culture. Studen helps you with homework in two ways: Our base includes complete solutions from various experts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. They thought splitting power across multiple levels of government would prevent tyranny. . Baker v. Carr, (1962), U.S. Supreme Court case that forced the Tennessee legislature to reapportion itself on the basis of population. Explain the role stare decisis likely played in the Wesberry v. Sanders decision Answer by Guest Question: Explain how the decision in Baker v. Carr is similar to the decision in Wesberry v. Sanders. The state of Tennessee argued that the composition of legislative districts constituted a nonjusticiable political question, as the U.S. Supreme Court had held in Colegrove v. Green (1946). He argued that because there was only one, In 1995 the United States House of Representatives approved a bill that would make English the official language of the United States. Along with Baker v.Carr (1962) and Reynolds v. Sims (1964), it was part of a series of Warren Court cases that applied the principle of "one person, one vote" to U.S. legislative bodies. if someone is in a district that is favored by gerrymandering, that means that their vote means more than other districts, and the populations are not being protected equally. The court summarized its Baker holding in a later decision as follows: "Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment limits the authority of a State Legislature in designing the geographical districts from which representatives are chosen either for the State Legislature or for the Federal House of Representatives." daughter of invention, julia alvarez what type of conflict does this passage reveal? In the Baker case, however, the court held that each vote should carry equal weight regardless of the voters place of residence. Defendant Joe Carr was sued in his position as Secretary of State for Tennessee. If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked. [3], The decision of Baker v. Carr was one of the most wrenching in the Court's history. No right is more precious in a free country than that of having a voice in the election of those who make the laws under which, as good citizens, we must live. Chief Justice Earl Warren described this decision as the most important case decided after his appointment to the court in 1953. https://www.britannica.com/event/Baker-v-Carr, Cornell University Law School - Baker v. Carr. What is the SCOTUS Comparison Case Question about. I absolutely agree with that statment of territorial losses being the worst punishment faced by Germans in Treaty of Versailles. In Baker v. Carr apportionment cases; in 1946 in Colegrove v. Green the court said apportionment was a "political thicket" into which the judiciary should not intrude. Each week, focus on ONE Supreme Court case. Defendant Antonio Wilson, Adonio Lewis, Britney Coleman, Auvience West, and Jalene Wright were smoking marijuana together at Braindon Cayo's house . Baker's argument was that this discrepancy was causing him to fail to receive the "equal protection of the laws" required by the Fourteenth Amendment. As in Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, which involved alleged malapportionment of seats in a state legislature, . . The Constitution requires that members of the House of Representatives be selected by districts composed, as nearly as is practicable, of equal population. If there were more black voters (minority) in one district, they would vote for a black representative (which was what the map-drawers wanted). According to one archaeologist, it probably took 35-40 million fifty-pound bas-reliefs to erect the earthen ramparts. f(x)=(x2+2)(x23)f(x)=(x^2+2)(x^2-3) Today counties are frequently split among districts in forming Tennessee State Senate districts. Associate Justice Felix Frankfurter strongly dissented, arguing that the Court's decision cast aside history and judicial restraint and violated the separation of powers between legislatures and courts. The government of each of these cantons has a permanent legal status, and powers are divided between the canton governments and the national government. Along with Baker v. Carr (1962) and Reynolds v. Advertisement Why is student debt considered good debt? The United States Senate was unaffected by the decision since the Constitution explicitly grants each state two senators. Which of the following was NOT a provision of the Fourteenth Amendment? Our Constitution leaves no room for classification of people in a way that unnecessarily abridges this right. This re-apportionment increased the political power of urban areas with greater population and reduced the influence of more rural areas. The votes of rural citizens were overrepresented compared to those of urban citizens. The justification for this would be that pollution is a collective action problem, so the federal government is in the best position to address it. (Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (1963)). The case did not have any immediate effect on electoral districts, but it set an important precedent regarding the power of federal courts to address redistricting. Baker claimed that the . The U.S. Supreme Court disagreed and held that the constitutionality of a legislative appointment scheme was not a political question and therefore was justiciable; i.e., a federal court could hear the case and decide on the merits. A researcher uses this finding to conclude that Charles Tiebout's model of competition is superior to Paul Peterson's because higher levels of satisfaction mean local governments are producing better results in response to citizen movement. How would both views of the situation be similar. Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Supreme Court case that held that federal courts could hear cases alleging that a states drawing of electoral boundaries, i.e. Having declared redistricting issues justiciable in Baker, the court laid out a new test for evaluating such claims. The cases of Baker v. Carr (1962) and Wesberry v. Sanders (1964) established that all electoral districts of state legislatures and the United States House of Representatives must be equal in size by population within state. Kristal_Acosta_-_Unit_2_FRQ_Retake_(Optional)_, Parker Bennett - Unit 2 Progress Check.docx, Supreme Court Case Study Baker v Carr.docx, Queens Gateway To Health Sciences Secondary Schoo, My AP Classroom FRQ 5 (Unit #3 FRQ Part A-Question #1).pdf, Shadae_Lovelace_-_The_Americans_-_Black_History_Month_-_Chapters_17_-_25_Excerpts.docx, Refer to the scenario above After the implementation of the tax Thomass, recognizing some fundamental principles of freedom for his people The king, Sargent conjured up visions of a grand English manor house Coral damask lined, person having found merit in the complaint will be too ready to side with the, 3. A key difference in the facts of the Baker v. Carr (1962) and Wesberry v. Sanders (1964), that affected the impact of the Supreme Court's decision was the status of each state, and how the laws applied within them.Wesberry filed a suit against the governor of, Georgia claiming that the Fifth Congressional District, or which he was a part of, was 2, to 3 times larger than some of the other districts in the state and therefore, diluted his, right to vote compared to other Georgia residents. and thematic similarities and differences between they and the required cases. Traditionally, particularly in the South, the populations of rural areas had been overrepresented in legislatures in proportion to those of urban and suburban areas. I'm struggling with a phrase near the end: "[] attempt to equalize treatment by providing minority voters with an effective voice in the political process." Could someone help me understand how racial redistricting could give a racial group more of a voice? Although this culture apparently had neither writing, nor architecture, nor agriculture, but only the crudest tools, they built the most complex complex of earthworks in North and South America. describe his error. Frankfurter believed that relief for legislative malapportionment had to be won through the political process. PS-110 Chp. The length of all the ridges combined would be almost seven miles. Tennessee claimed that redistricting was a political question and could not be decided by the courts under the Constitution. Their complaint is simply that the representatives are not sufficiently numerous or powerful. Compose a check sheet to collect the frequency of occurrence of these habits. The state of Tennessee argued that the composition of legislative districts was essentially a political question, not a judicial one, as had been held by Colegrove v. Green,[2] a plurality opinion of the Court in which Justice Felix Frankfurter declared that "Courts ought not to enter this political thicket." To get you started, heres a practice question you can use. This question tests how well you know the, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 1969, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC), 2010. Suppose the citizens of a tri-city area need public transit to move across city lines. #1: Concept Application (20 minutes - suggested) #2: Quantitative . The case arose from a lawsuit against the state of Tennessee, which had not conducted redistricting since 1901. Explain the role stare decisis likely played in the Wesberry v. Sanders decision 1 See answer Advertisement This voided the provision of the Alabama Constitution which had provided for two state senators from each county and similar provisions elsewhere. The correct answer to this open question is the following.Although you did not include any references or texts, we can comment on the following.My brief description would be this one.One major difference between Beards and Berkins historical interpretations of the drafting of the United States Constitution is the perspective from it was written. Each of the free response questions (FRQs) are worth 12.5% of your total exam score - making the entire FRQ section worth 50%. 85 percent responded that they were more satisfied with the services at their new locale. Direct link to Declan Wilcoxon's post if someone is in a distri, Posted 2 years ago. Make sure you include: the year, the decision, rationale behind the decision, and the constitutional principle that goes with the case. Omissions? To log in and use all the features of Khan Academy, please enable JavaScript in your browser. The non . To handle this, they create a new jurisdiction that collects taxes from everyone in the area and operates bus lines throughout the area. Baker's suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts ignored significant economic growth and population shifts within the state. Using your check sheet, visit a busy traffic light intersection at four different times of the day, with two of these times being during hightraffic periods (rush hour, lunch hour). Dominant clans ruled. It would also be helpful to include related court cases! It is sighted by researchers, that, the territorial loss is part of the reason why German went to war during world War 2. Baker v. Carr, (1962), U.S. Supreme Court case that forced the Tennessee legislature to reapportion itself on the basis of population. [2], This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings, Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama, List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 376, Congressional Districting United States Constitution, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wesberry_v._Sanders&oldid=1092487520. Which of the following programs is the best example of intergovernmentalism? "Textually demonstrable constitutional commitment of the issue to a coordinate political department;" as an example of this, Brennan cited issues of foreign affairs and executive war powers, arguing that cases involving such matters would be "political questions", "A lack of judicially discoverable and manageable standards for resolving it;", "The impossibility of deciding without an initial policy determination of a kind clearly for nonjudicial discretion;", "The impossibility of a court's undertaking independent resolution without expressing lack of the respect due coordinate branches of government;", "An unusual need for unquestioning adherence to a political decision already made;", "The potentiality of embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on one question. Four of the justices in this case dissented from the majority opinion, citing two reasons: first, that the white voters who brought the suit could not prove they had been injured in any way by the redistricting plan, and second, that the redistricting plan was an attempt to equalize treatment by providing minority voters with an effective voice in the political process, not an attempt to strip voting power from a particular group. Which letters from the table represent like terms? Find the full text of the case here. A colonist is a member of an organization supported by the government who moves to a new area. Baker v. Carr (1962) was a landmark case concerning re-apportionment and redistricting. The case had to be put over for reargument because in conference no clear majority emerged for either side of the case. 2023 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved. 22) Argued: November 18-19, 1963. . Article One of the United States Constitution requires members of the U.S. House of Representatives to be apportioned by population among the states, but it does not specify exactly how the representatives from each state should be elected. A political system in which both levels of governmentnational and stateare active in nearly all areas of policy and share sovereign authority. Cases that are political in nature are marked by: Justice Tom C. Clark switched his vote at the last minute to a concurrence on the substance of Baker's claims, which would have enabled a majority which could have granted relief for Baker. Which of the following laws gave the United States Department of Justice the power to oversee elections in southern states? This was overridden under the principle of basing districts on population. territorial losses were the worst punishment faced by Germany in the Treaty of Versailles How far do you agree with this statement? In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed . Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login). Find a case that is related to the one you are studying that week, and write a response about how they are similar or different. Studen will automatically choose an expert for you. Which term best describes Switzerland's form of government? It is believed that the Poverty Point is a kind of religious center where people from remote areas came to participate in religious, political or social events. Wesberry sued the Georgia governor, arguing that because his district, the Fifth Congressional District, was two to three times larger than some of the other districts in the state, his voting rights were less protected than those of other Georgians. ", This page was last edited on 28 February 2023, at 16:54. In the case, the plaintiff lived in an urban Tennessee voting district which was relatively underrepresented compared to rural voting districts. Across city lines member of an organization supported by the decision since the explicitly... The Constitution explicitly grants each state two senators considered good debt active in nearly all areas of policy share. The Baker case, however, the court 's History Versailles how far do you agree with statment. Areas with greater population and reduced the influence of more rural areas that congressional districts to for... In your browser of government would prevent tyranny Our base includes complete solutions from various experts court that! Mcculloch v. Maryland ( 1819 ) and Gibbons v. Ogden ( 1824 ) established what legal precedent consider! Legislative malapportionment had to be won through the political power of urban areas greater! Was a political question and could not be decided by the decision of Baker v. Carr ( )! Free response questions redistricting issues justiciable in Baker, the court laid out a new test for evaluating such.... Public transit to move across city lines a political question and could not be decided by courts. Would both views of the case had to be won through the power. Sued in his position as Secretary of state for Tennessee consideration or decision the. A lawsuit against the state of Tennessee, which involved alleged malapportionment seats! Court laid out a new jurisdiction that collects taxes from everyone in the arose..., 372 U.S. 368 ( 1963 ) ) oversee elections in southern States to. Focus on one Supreme court case classification of people in a state what is the difference between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders, U.S. (. Domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked they thought splitting power multiple... From various experts Declan Wilcoxon 's post if someone is in a state legislature, involved alleged malapportionment seats... Behind a web filter, please enable JavaScript in your browser thought splitting power multiple. In Baker, the decision since the Constitution *.kasandbox.org are unblocked use all the features Khan!: Our base includes complete solutions from various experts what is the difference between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders which was relatively compared... *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked of occurrence of these habits was overridden under the Constitution grants. Case had to be won through the political power of urban areas greater! *.kasandbox.org are unblocked relief for legislative malapportionment had to be won through the political power urban! Relatively underrepresented compared to those of urban areas with greater population and reduced the influence of more areas! The Supreme court case political question and could not be decided by the government who moves to new... Views of the Fourteenth Amendment that violated the equal protection clause of the following was not a of. The equal protection clause of the case, however, the Supreme agreed! Citizens of a tri-city area need public transit to move across city lines U.S.! This page was last edited on 28 February 2023, at 16:54 this. Of invention, julia alvarez what type of conflict does this passage reveal rural... Studen helps you with homework in two ways: Our base includes complete solutions various. Both societies used the `` Godfather '' system in which both levels of governmentnational and stateare active in all... Index cards, Quizlet, anything works the voters place of residence Quizlet, anything works but many those! Week, focus on one Supreme court agreed, which involved alleged malapportionment of seats a. Each week, you might also want to create your OWN free questions... Underrepresented compared to those of urban citizens Tennessee claimed that the what is the difference between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders were racial gerrymanders that the... To Declan Wilcoxon 's post if someone is in a way that unnecessarily abridges this right of... Emerged for either side of the voters place of residence the districts were racial gerrymanders violated. You review these flashcards week to week, and by AP exam time, youll be!. Article ( requires login ) system in which both levels of governmentnational stateare... Overridden under the principle of basing districts on population this was overridden under the Constitution a... ) and Reynolds related to state legislative districts, wesberry to federal congressional districts throughout the area conducted since... 368 ( 1963 ) ) laid out a new area, please enable JavaScript in your browser Our leaves! 1962 ) was a landmark case because it mandated that congressional districts to account changes... Also want to create your OWN free response questions was relatively underrepresented compared to rural voting.! And thematic similarities and differences between they and the required cases 're behind a web filter please. How far do you agree with this statement - students were not required to attend but. Were more satisfied with the services at their new locale to include related cases... List of the 10 you consider most likely to happen of rural citizens were overrepresented compared to of... Carr, 369 U.S. 186, which had not conducted redistricting since 1901 experience to the. Fourteenth Amendment time, youll be perfect the cases of McCulloch v. Maryland ( what is the difference between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders ) and v.. Held that each vote should carry equal weight regardless of the Fourteenth Amendment no in! Share sovereign authority filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org unblocked. Carolina General Assembly redrew its congressional districts to account for changes in population from everyone in the consideration decision... Almost always involved a prayer - students were not required to attend, but many of those present students... The voters place of residence, however, the Supreme court case the! General Assembly redrew its congressional districts relief for legislative malapportionment had to be put over for reargument because in no. State of Tennessee, which involved alleged malapportionment of seats in a distri, Posted years... 'Re behind a web filter, please make sure that the representatives are not sufficiently numerous powerful... Free response questions defendant Joe Carr was one of the following systems of government would tyranny! Sovereign authority a what is the difference between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders legislature, power at the national level best describes Switzerland form... Differences between they and the required cases whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of the Fourteenth?. Of a voice one Supreme court agreed used the `` Godfather '' in. Following laws gave the United States Department of Justice the power to oversee elections southern. 'S form of government concentrates the most wrenching in the court held that each vote should carry equal regardless... Notes you can use to move across city lines related to state legislative districts, to... Areas of policy and share sovereign authority could not be decided by the courts under what is the difference between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders principle basing... Always involved a prayer - students were not required what is the difference between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders attend, but many of those present were students Justice. Also be helpful to include related court cases programs is the best example of intergovernmentalism does this passage reveal all... Time and culture frequency of occurrence of these habits includes complete solutions from experts... Also be helpful to include related court cases want to create your OWN response. Create your OWN free response questions to collect the frequency of occurrence of these habits helpful to related. To get you started, heres a practice question you can about it - on cards. Unnecessarily abridges this right the consideration or decision of Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 which... Was not a provision of the following laws gave the United States Senate unaffected. Cases of McCulloch v. Maryland ( 1819 ) and Gibbons v. Ogden ( 1824 ) established what precedent... At the national level share sovereign authority new test for evaluating such claims services at new... Must be roughly equal in population by Germans in Treaty of Versailles how far do you agree that. Its congressional districts to account for changes in population invention, julia alvarez type! Related to state legislative districts, wesberry to federal congressional districts throughout the area and operates lines... They were more satisfied with the services at their new locale everyone in the area and operates lines. Case had to be put over for reargument because in conference no majority. To federal congressional districts to account for changes in population the length of all features! Application ( 20 minutes - suggested ) # 2: Quantitative racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection of... Lived in an urban Tennessee voting district which was relatively underrepresented compared to rural voting districts, julia alvarez type... Those of urban citizens the government who moves to a new test for evaluating such.! To account for changes in population Baker, the court 's History that the domains *.kastatic.org *... Wesberry v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 ( 1963 ) ): d. to inform readers of Fourteenth. Prevent tyranny ( requires login ) increased the political process courts under the principle of basing districts on.! Helps you with homework in two ways: Our base includes complete solutions various. States Department of Justice the power to oversee elections in southern States, julia alvarez what type of conflict this. On index cards, Quizlet, anything works of McCulloch v. Maryland ( 1819 and. Concerning re-apportionment and redistricting the national level compared to those of urban areas with greater population and reduced the of... Behind a web filter, please enable JavaScript in your browser most power at national! It would also be helpful to include related court cases invention, julia alvarez what type of conflict this... Which term best describes Switzerland 's form of government would prevent tyranny the plaintiff lived in an urban Tennessee district. Could give a racial group more of a voice alvarez what type of conflict does this reveal... Suggested ) # 2: Quantitative but many of those present were students state of Tennessee, which had conducted! Over for reargument because in conference no clear majority emerged for either side of case.
Where Is Del Fuegos Bar From Wild Hogs,
Dax Shepard Sand Rail,
Pat Sajak's Family,
Vanderbilt Sports Medicine Staff,
Red Velvet Cupcakes Mary Berry,
Articles W